Should the government use GTMO for refugees in the future?
Your Answers
34% Yes
66% No

yes Yes, it is a very good place for transitioning people. Not to be holding them as prisoners, of course, but providing safety while their eventual expatriation can be best ascertained.

Frederick Ward, Los Gatos, CA

no Refugees were treated like prisoners. They should have been given political asylum and flown to the US.

raymond love, orlando, FL

no using the property of another country, against that countries will, to house what we consider the most evil people on the planet because we're too scared and weak to house them on our own soil? Thanks America, you guys sure are a good people. I bet you all believe in God. boy it really shows!

rich lee, miami, ga

yes Although I would prefer not, since my family was evacuated during the Haitian refugee situation, I do see the need for a place off shore for holding and processing refugees so as not to overrun the country. And you people who were never there have NO idea how well the refugees had/have it!!!

Karen Usiak, Bealeton, VA

This project was made possible by contributions from participating universities, plus the Libra Foundation, the New York Council on the Humanities and the Open Society Foundations.

This Week in Guantánamo: 2015 and 2007

February 19, 2015: Former GTMO detainee David Hicks wins a legal challenge against a conviction of providing material support for terrorism. His ‘guilty’ finding is dismissed. Hicks describes ongoing medical problems as a result of his time at GTMO.

March 30, 2007: David Hicks becomes the first GTMO War on Terror detainee to be convicted. He is sentenced to 9 months in jail, to be served in his home country of Australia.