ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, TEMPE
BROWN UNIVERSITY
INDIANA UNIVERSITY-
PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, NEW BRUNSWICK
THE NEW SCHOOL FOR PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, Amherst
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
AT GREENSBORO
UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA
This project was made possible by contributions from participating universities, plus the Libra Foundation, the New York Council on the Humanities and the Open Society Foundations.
February 19, 2015: Former GTMO detainee David Hicks wins a legal challenge against a conviction of providing material support for terrorism. His ‘guilty’ finding is dismissed. Hicks describes ongoing medical problems as a result of his time at GTMO.
March 30, 2007: David Hicks becomes the first GTMO War on Terror detainee to be convicted. He is sentenced to 9 months in jail, to be served in his home country of Australia.
no Don't close the base. Government trying to make it like stateside. It is losing its "uniqueness". 76-79,81-83
Lloyd Richsrds, Ben Wheeler, Texas
yes That's a poor question because Guantanamo Bay is already a legal, legitimate U.S. controlled territory. No one BUT the U.S.A. should have any say, whatsoever. A better question might be what are the valuable reasons for having that base, not who should have a say.
Frederick Ward, Los Gatos, CA
no The US has already done imeasurable damage. History has already shown what happens when the US have a voice in shaping GITMO!
Submitted by SMS
yes poor question. It is already our legal territory. If we loose GTMO we have no other base in that region to stop or watch other military activities. It is a vital base in keeping security for the USA.
Debbie Flake