Guantánamo Public Memory Project

As foreign policies change, should the United States maintain permanent foreign bases?
1903–1964  Constructing GTMO

Leave a Comment

16 Comments  |  Sort By: Most Recent

April 18th, 2016
rich lee
miami, fl
no sure if we want to take over the world, makes perfect sense. why is it so hard to just put ourselves in their shoes? what…Read More
no sure if we want to take over the world, makes perfect sense. why is it so hard to just put ourselves in their shoes? what if countries of the world came here and forced their military and their bases in our towns? DUH! Read less
May 3rd, 2014
Lucy Avery
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
no Does any of you who say "yes" actually have been on a foreign military base? Do you know that US soldiers actually can get…Read More
no Does any of you who say "yes" actually have been on a foreign military base? Do you know that US soldiers actually can get away with rape? Do you know that these bases actually perpetuate local violence and crime, undermine international instability, leaving local residents no means to claim damages Read less
November 13th, 2013
Steven Molloy
Villa Hills , KY
yes Yes for the protection of Good against Evil around the world.
December 13th, 2012
Submitted by SMS
no The expense is too great for bases that serve little purpose
December 9th, 2012
Submitted by SMS
yes Absolutely, the united states needs to maintain a strong foreign policy
December 7th, 2012
Submitted by SMS
yes History has shown us we must always be ready
October 29th, 2014
LAST 1010
NEW ORLEANS, LA
no We should only have temporary bases in areas that need our help.
April 23rd, 2014
Frederick Ward
Los Gatos, CA
yes Unfortunately, so much of the world is unstable and cannot be relied upon to police itself and, as such, can be a threat…Read More
yes Unfortunately, so much of the world is unstable and cannot be relied upon to police itself and, as such, can be a threat to our own safety and well-being. Until such time as that changes, it behooves us to be prepared for imminent threats in an expedient fashion. Therefore, this presence is good. Read less
April 15th, 2013
Karen Usiak
Bealeton, Virginia
yes The United Nations isn't capable of doing much of anything to keep peace in the world. The United States is always looked…Read More
yes The United Nations isn't capable of doing much of anything to keep peace in the world. The United States is always looked to as the savior when things get tough and if we don't have foreign bases we won't have the ability to help out allies Read less
December 9th, 2012
Submitted by SMS
no The United Nations is capable of handling foreign policy and conflict
December 8th, 2012
Submitted by SMS
no Diplomatic missions, yes; but not military bases.
October 29th, 2014
Ross c
New Orleans, Louisiana
yes Yes because in most cases, they help protect the area from some type of military conflict
November 25th, 2013
Catherine Chapman
Pisgah Forest, NC
yes In 1964, WE cut off the water lines. There were no shopping "malls" built until well after the missile crisis. Prior to…Read More
yes In 1964, WE cut off the water lines. There were no shopping "malls" built until well after the missile crisis. Prior to the missile crisis we had one Exchange and one Commissary, both very small by current standards and stocked with only the basic commodities. Read less
March 11th, 2013
Submitted by SMS
no Lets go back to our roots, Isolationism is true peace and prosperity.
December 9th, 2012
Submitted by SMS
yes They are essential to maintaining our standing as a world leader
December 8th, 2012
Submitted by SMS
yes We need to be able to deploy

Creative: Picture Projects & Tronvig Group