Should the memories of past residents be part of the current dialogue on GTMO?
Your Answers
89% Yes
11% No

no Evil shouldn't be allowed to speak unless it is to uncover more evil to be stopped.

Steven Molloy, Villa Hills , KY

yes Part 1: Guantanamo is NOT the same as Guantanamo Bay. Part 2: if you do not include their perspective, you are marginalizing a group of people who have empirical contributions. It's NOT research if there is no EMPIRICAL stats measured. It's just rehashing of someone else's research.

Catherine Chapman, Brevard, NC

no Let each case speak for itself

Submitted by SMS

yes This is a HUGE disappointment to those of us who thought you actually wanted to preserve the REAL memories of Gitmo! You have perverted this entire project into nothing more than a propaganda machine about the terrorists and the detention camps. So sad, because you missed a great opportunity!

Karen Usiak, Bealeton, VA

This project was made possible by contributions from participating universities, plus the Libra Foundation, the New York Council on the Humanities and the Open Society Foundations.

This Week in Guantánamo: 2015 and 2007

February 19, 2015: Former GTMO detainee David Hicks wins a legal challenge against a conviction of providing material support for terrorism. His ‘guilty’ finding is dismissed. Hicks describes ongoing medical problems as a result of his time at GTMO.

March 30, 2007: David Hicks becomes the first GTMO War on Terror detainee to be convicted. He is sentenced to 9 months in jail, to be served in his home country of Australia.